Versions Compared

Old Version 3

changes.mady.by.user Anonymous

Saved on

compared with

New Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Anonymous

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Part 2 of the meeting listed the critical issue needed to be addressed and assign (proposed) the PIC (Person in Charge). The issues are listed on the slide. Here are some of the assignment:


Issue: Sivers Asymmetry framework

Description: Setup a framework/macro to extract Sivers Asymmetry from a Full simulation 

PIC: Zulkaida & Forhad


 

Issue: E906-E1039 Bridge

 Description: Provide information or general framework or dictionary for new comers to learn E906 data

 

PIC: Kenichi 


 

Issue: Detector performance

 

Description: Establish methods to measure the detector performance & calibration

 PIC: Mindy (for Chamber)

 


 

Issue: Trigger performance

Description: Establish methods to measure the trigger efficiency

PIC: Michigan grup for FPGA trigger (proposed in the meeting, I will email them soon), Forhad


Issue: Systematics

Description: Perform a packing factor measurement, Establish the best method to measure the dilution factor, Keeping track for all non-negligible systematic source that affect the Sivers asymmetry

PIC: Arthur, David UNH (proposed)

 

Issue: Background studies

Description: Establish the best method to find the line shape & simulate the random background, Establish the best method to separate events from beam dump

PIC: Zulkaida 


 

Issue: Tracking

 

Description: Establish an efficient tracking algorithm 

 

PIC: Haiwang



Issue 4: Questions from Rick

Rick could not attend the Thursday meeting. But he sent me an email  about some point needed to be discussed in the meeting:

1. Instructions for getting started in analysis (for people new to this experiment and our software eg: me)? That's my job (Zulkaida). Give me a week to provide these instructions

2. Can we reconstruct MC events using existing reconstruction code? Yes

3. What is the strategy for production reconstruction? We are working on it

4. We will need to plan a “Mock Data Challenge” for this spring? Unfortunately, this point haven't been discussed thoroughly yet in the meeting

5. Determine what is needed for calibrating of the detector? We are starting to assign people to address this issue for each sub-system
    o Plateau/Efficiencty of chambers/hodoscopes (software, computing resources)
    o Alignment of chambers/hodoscopes           (software, computing resources)

Issue 5: Priority

The next priority will be the E906-E1039 Bridge. Thanks to Kenichi who will provide us with some lectures so the "new comers" including me could learn about the E906 experience, have an insight about the nature of the data & data processing, etc.